In clinical trials, the accuracy and integrity of data are paramount. While the goal is to handle data systematically and programmatically, there are occasions when hardcoding becomes necessary. Note the following considerations for when to hardcode and the importance of documenting these decisions.
Distinguishing between a medical device and a drug may be challenging to define for some products. We turn our attention to a crucial tool that Sponsors may use to have the FDA classify your product: the Request for Designation (RFD). In this blog, we’ll describe what an RFD entails and its significance in the regulatory realm, providing a comprehensive overview of the process.
Interim sample size adjustments and their many approaches are a frequent discussion point between Sponsors and statisticians during protocol development. One such approach is a blinded assessment of variance, favored by some Sponsors for its lack of alpha penalty. We will discuss how this method works, the pros, the cons, and if this approach might be appropriate for your protocol.
The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) adopted a harmonized drug-drug interaction (DDI) guidance (ICH M12) in May 2024. The next step is for this guidance to be implemented by ICH members; the FDA and EMA have already implemented the guidance. Read our blog for key highlights of the 2024 ICH M12 Guidance.
Sponsors often rely on Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQs) to group adverse events for detection of safety signals across clinical trials. Additionally, the FDA has introduced their own version of adverse event groupings – FDA MedDRA Queries (FMQs). So, what’s the difference?
Are you developing a new medicinal product for a rare disease and interested in applying for orphan drug designation (ODD) in the European Union (EU)? This blog lists the main areas that you will need to address in your ODD application.
Diversity Action Plans will soon be required for phase 3 clinical trials and other pivotal studies of drugs and biological products conducted in the US. Are you ready for this requirement?
Did you know that insufficient enrollment is the leading cause for clinical trials being halted? Study sponsors rightly embrace those sites which are high performing as they give a study the best opportunity to meet its enrollment targets. However, is it possible for there to be overreliance on these high enrolling sites? Unfortunately, the answer is yes.
Responding to information requests (IRs) from FDA during review of a marketing application can be stressful. How do you survive the rollercoaster of requests? We have outlined useful tips and best practices for managing responses to IRs during FDA review of your marketing application.
Regulatory agencies like the FDA require substantial evidence of the drug’s effectiveness for its intended use and sufficient information to conclude that the drug is safe. However, flexibility is given in how the standard can be met given the challenges associated with the limited number of subjects available in rare disease.
On 26 April 2023, the European Commission (EC) proposed reforming the European Union (EU) pharmaceutical legislation. This revision constitutes the first major overhaul of the pharmaceutical legislation since 2004. It will adapt the legislation to the needs of the 21st century.
For the first time, some children with life-threatening food allergies can safely eat in the school cafeteria and celebrate at a friend’s birthday party without fear of accidental allergen exposure. That’s not just progress—it’s the kind of outcome that reshapes lives and changes what’s possible in clinical development.
According to the Study Data Technical Conformance Guide (October 2024), sponsors should prepare a document called the study data standardization plan (SDSP) for each of their development programs to describe the submission of standardized non-clinical and clinical study data to the FDA.
Most of those who work with Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) datasets have probably heard of the term “traceability.” But why is it important and how can it best be implemented?
Real-world data (RWD) has become a buzzword phrase in recent articles in clinical trial research. But there is often a difference between the idealistic and future use of RWD and how it can and is practically being used to advance drug development. What is RWD? How is RWD being applied now? What are the potential uses for it in the future?
In complex or longer duration clinical studies, it is common to submit the data up to a predetermined date, often known as the Data Cutoff Date. We will discuss how data cutoff is implemented in SDTM database, since SDTMs are the source data for submission.
New Drug Applications – When is it ok to not submit data to FDA? Generally speaking, the FDA wants to see all data collected during drug development – all clinical trials, across all indications, using any formulation of your drug, in any region of the world.
Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 (the “Pediatric Regulation”) introduced the obligation for Sponsors to apply for a pediatric investigation plan (PIP) early in the drug development process and conduct their pediatric clinical trials accordingly to a PIP agreed with the EMA. Compliance with the Pediatric Regulation is mandatory for any Sponsor seeking marketing authorization for a new medicinal product in the EU.
The accelerated approval pathway has been instrumental in bringing groundbreaking therapies to patients facing serious or life-threatening conditions.
Do I need to up-version to the most recent versions of the standard from the current Catalog when preparing to submit clinical study data? How can I figure this out? Check out the latest blog from Rho to find out.
© 2025 Rho, Inc. All rights reserved.
