Real-world data (RWD) has become a buzzword phrase in recent articles in clinical trial research. But there is often a difference between the idealistic and future use of RWD and how it can and is practically being used to advance drug development. What is RWD? How is RWD being applied now? What are the potential uses for it in the future?
In complex or longer duration clinical studies, it is common to submit the data up to a predetermined date, often known as the Data Cutoff Date. We will discuss how data cutoff is implemented in SDTM database, since SDTMs are the source data for submission.
New Drug Applications – When is it ok to not submit data to FDA? Generally speaking, the FDA wants to see all data collected during drug development – all clinical trials, across all indications, using any formulation of your drug, in any region of the world.
Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 (the “Pediatric Regulation”) introduced the obligation for Sponsors to apply for a pediatric investigation plan (PIP) early in the drug development process and conduct their pediatric clinical trials accordingly to a PIP agreed with the EMA. Compliance with the Pediatric Regulation is mandatory for any Sponsor seeking marketing authorization for a new medicinal product in the EU.
The accelerated approval pathway has been instrumental in bringing groundbreaking therapies to patients facing serious or life-threatening conditions.
Do I need to up-version to the most recent versions of the standard from the current Catalog when preparing to submit clinical study data? How can I figure this out? Check out the latest blog from Rho to find out.
In clinical trials, the accuracy and integrity of data are paramount. While the goal is to handle data systematically and programmatically, there are occasions when hardcoding becomes necessary. Note the following considerations for when to hardcode and the importance of documenting these decisions.
Distinguishing between a medical device and a drug may be challenging to define for some products. We turn our attention to a crucial tool that Sponsors may use to have the FDA classify your product: the Request for Designation (RFD). In this blog, we’ll describe what an RFD entails and its significance in the regulatory realm, providing a comprehensive overview of the process.
Interim sample size adjustments and their many approaches are a frequent discussion point between Sponsors and statisticians during protocol development. One such approach is a blinded assessment of variance, favored by some Sponsors for its lack of alpha penalty. We will discuss how this method works, the pros, the cons, and if this approach might be appropriate for your protocol.
The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) adopted a harmonized drug-drug interaction (DDI) guidance (ICH M12) in May 2024. The next step is for this guidance to be implemented by ICH members; the FDA and EMA have already implemented the guidance. Read our blog for key highlights of the 2024 ICH M12 Guidance.
Four scientific principles. One unifying concept. The Cohesion Effect experience. SCOPE Summit is a place where innovation thrives. Thousands of attendees and hundreds of exhibitors from around the world, all
When Tonix came to us, the stakes were high, and the timelines were tight. Their goal? To submit a New Drug Application (NDA) for TONMYA™ and, for the first time
Every CRO out there will tell you they’re site-centric, and on pitch decks, they use the right buzzwords to prove it. Curious. Collaborative. Dependable. Problem-solvers. Sound familiar? That’s great in
You’re responsible for showing risk oversight, protocol clarity, and a site-friendly design—but you’ve got a lean team, a looming trial, and no time to decode the 110-page ICH E6(R3) guidance.
ICH E6(R3) is here, and with it, clinical teams are bracing for the impacts. Biotechs are being asked to develop clear and concise protocols, demonstrate oversight throughout the trial, integrate
On 26 April 2023, the European Commission (EC) proposed reforming the European Union (EU) pharmaceutical legislation. This revision constitutes the first major overhaul of the pharmaceutical legislation since 2004. It will adapt the legislation to the needs of the 21st century.
For the first time, some children with life-threatening food allergies can safely eat in the school cafeteria and celebrate at a friend’s birthday party without fear of accidental allergen exposure. That’s not just progress—it’s the kind of outcome that reshapes lives and changes what’s possible in clinical development.
Sponsors are generally aware of the commonly held Type B FDA meetings, from pre-IND to End of Phase 2 (EOP2) to pre-NDA/BLA, but how often do you take advantage of additional Type C meetings for agency feedback? Continued discussion and input from the agency can be very beneficial, even outside of the milestones that allow for a Type B Meeting.
According to the Study Data Technical Conformance Guide (October 2024), sponsors should prepare a document called the study data standardization plan (SDSP) for each of their development programs to describe the submission of standardized non-clinical and clinical study data to the FDA.
Most of those who work with Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) datasets have probably heard of the term “traceability.” But why is it important and how can it best be implemented?
